Skip Nav

Banned Book Essay Help

').f(b.get(["POPULAR_CATEGORIES"],!1),b,"h",["s"]).w("

❶Though I concede that parents do have the right to monitor what their children read, they do not have the right to remove books from public libraries or monitor what other children in the city read. Start your FREE trial.

banned book essay help

Banned books essay as the college thesis
How to cite this page
Professional thesis writing service

The Diary of Anne Frank. To Kill a Mockingbird. The Da Vinci Code. The Grapes of Wrath. These literary classics have been vital to the education of many, especially children and adolescents. These great novels both teach important values and educate children about world affairs and classic themes.

Unfortunately, each of these novels has been banned at one point in time. Many of these classic stories have been banned because of sexual references, racial slurs, religious intolerance, or supposed witchcraft promotion.

Although some may consider these books controversial or inappropriate, many English classes have required us to read these books.

Like the teachers that assigned us these books, I believe that even controversial books can ultimately boost, not deter, our educational wealth. I oppose book banning for three main reasons. First, I believe that education should be open to everyone. Everyone should have an opportunity to read any literature of their choosing and form his or her own opinions based on the reading.

Micah Issitt lists "three basic rights covered under the freedom of the press: The government should not restrict books from being published or interfere into personal affairs as this is an infringement of the First Amendment.

Finally, I believe that parents should monitor what their own children read, but not have the authority to ban other children from reading these novels. For these reasons, I conclude that the government should play no role in the issue what citizens do and do not read, and that book restriction should remain a solely private matter. B At first glance, the debate over banning books appears unimportant.

Nevertheless, this debate has divided our nation into those who favor censoring books to protect their impressionable adolescents, and those who argue that education should be open for everybody without interference from the government in restricting the publishing and accessing of these books. Issitt argues that censoring books violates the First Amendment, stating that "citizens must be free to seek out any media, regardless of content, that they deem appropriate for entertainment, information, or education.

Denying the rights of the consumer, in any area, is one of the hallmarks of authoritarianism. The First Amendment protects the freedom of expression and speech, and by prohibiting certain messages, the government clearly infringes upon public rights. On the other hand, Healey claims that censorship does not "repress information that teenagers and children are exposed to," but merely gives parents the rights to educate their children in the ways they deem appropriate.

Though I concede that parents do have the right to monitor what their children read, they do not have the right to remove books from public libraries or monitor what other children in the city read. Healey attempts to persuade readers that "censorship of books should not be about silencing voices on important topics, but about steering young people toward the best possible literature;" however, she fails to specify what constitutes as "the best possible literature.

Those who protest against these books have clearly not studied them in depth. Even Healey admits that "concerned parents and community members react without taking the time to closely investigate the books they want banned. Prohibiting children from reading a book will not enhance their moral values.

Rather, banning a book more likely will increase curiosity for reading it. I also empathize with parents who ban books with controversial or uncomfortable subjects because they are unsure as to how their children will react or how to explain such topics.

A good way to discuss these subjects with children is to read books with various views on the subject so that children can experience multiple points of view before forming their own opinions. Healey herself agrees that such a method "might help young people better understand the world they live in, the human condition, and issues they face in their culture. Our society, especially our younger children, needs to read these books since fully understanding a topic requires knowledge of both sides.

If we choose to disregard even a highly unpopular opinion, we intentionally choose to live in ignorance, only partially educated in a topic we claim to know so well.

Take for consideration the controversial books that tackle difficult, touchy social issues like homosexuality. While this may seem like a valid argument, really it is just skirting around the actual issue. It is not only selfish, but also harmful to the overall education of their children. This act of prohibiting books is just the parents way of evading of the conversation with their child about these sensitive issues.

These two books are issues that Healey brings up in her argument on how groups were upset about the way these books informed their children of homosexuality. Homosexuality and other touchy social issues are part of every day life, and for a group to attempt to censor this subject from younger society is almost absurd; these issues are not monstrous and the censorship of them not only shows prejudice but lack of respect.

Banning books seems to be the most public solution for a private matter- not everyone should have to suffer restrictions because one group feels uncomfortable with the book. That being said, there are often books that contain graphic and often highly inappropriate material; I do consent that these books should be censored at the discretion of the parent, or anyone involved however, no one is forcing books upon others, so we should not be forced to remove them.

Banning books from public congregations is not what the government was intended to do. Topics that seem socially outlawed in public, let alone published, have been banned because their immoral content may have a negative affect on younger children.

The child would never be able to learn these things if the book was banned, nor be able to form his or her own opinion about that certain topic. Healey discusses that the book, 33 Snowfish, a "dark story of three teenage runaways who are victims of various forms of abuse However, having these stories banned all together would just further shelter a child whose parents may not be willing to discuss these issues with them at all. Even though these books center around scary topics, they are educating children on real life matters that they will be exposed to once they venture into the world themselves.

Healey goes on to make the point that the books should not be banned as well, since it is a matter of private opinion not one to be made by the public libraries of a community. She suggests that schools should "inform parents about the kinds of books they offer children" in their libraries and classrooms instead of banning them. With the knowledge that some of these books have to offer, children can learn how not to act and what can be the consequences if they do misbehave.

This learning experience could turn around with the help of a parent and pass a positive affect over the child. Books do not simply impart general information; they heavily influence a child, the future generation.

They made me feel at ease and worked out my every query with a smile on their face. Let us imagine this scenario. You are given an assignment by your professor that you have to submit by tomorrow morning; but, you already have commitments with your friends for a party tonight and you can back out. So what do you do? You would want someone to help you out in this situation by either completing half the work and you can finish it once you get home or you would want someone to take care of the whole work.

Definitely, it will be the latter but at an affordable price. With our cheap essay writing service, you can not only have the essay written in economical price but also get it delivered within the given deadline. One of the things we value is your money and would never compromise on it so we guarantee you that we will only provide you with the finest work possible. When a student starts his search for a cheap reliable essay writing service, his main concern is that the people running the essay writing service know what they are doing.

The last thing a student would want is his money being misused by people. The people at 6DollarEssay. So when you come to us with your essay problem, we ensure that you get only affordable custom essay writing from us and nothing less than that. In order to keep our customers satisfied, if we have to walk an extra mile, we would happily to do so without any sweat!

Each of our academic essay experts has gone through strict filtering before being hired to work for us in-house. There are several websites on the Internet that would offer you affordable packages for the service they are providing; however, they would have a hidden catch that would lead you to pay more than you actually bargained for. When we say that we are offering you reasonable essay service, we are keeping our word of honor which is to give you packages that are light on your pocket.

It is entirely up to you which package you choose, whether it is the cheapest one or the most expensive one, our quality of work will not depend on the package. We provide top-notch quality to every client, irrespective of the amount they pay to us. Moreover, we offer the diverse type of benefits when you choose our cheap essay writing service USA.

When you use our service, you are placing your confidence in us which is why we would like to inform you that all our benefits are free of charge! You do not have to pay any extra penny for this at all. Following are the benefits we offer our clients:. Individuals who are expert in their individual fields and know what they are doing.

Customer support all-time availability: Original and well-researched content:

Prompts For Informative Writing

Main Topics

Privacy Policy

Sep 06,  · We offer a wide variety of writing services including essays, research papers, term papers, thesis among many others. We have a lot of experience in the academic writing industry. We .

Privacy FAQs

Feb 25,  · Best Answer: Hi humingbird, From what I understand, the prompt is asking you to explain why people wanted to censor or ban this book, whether they had good reasons or bad reasons for wanting to censor it, and if it is ever a good idea to censor a processory.tk: Resolved.

About Our Ads

Books are written to help the people who chose to read them, and to me they should have the right to choose the books they want to read. Even though some of the content may seem explicit, most people would agree that that is not the theme of the book. respect essay for kids. Banned books essay as the college thesis. Speed of sample term papers sound essay banned books is ms. Inside the hill, deutschman. It would hardly win us respect, he cautions, if our aesthetic lives has analogies in the mediterranean sea off the coast of the black hole from earth, as well as her brother in the.

Cookie Info

Banned Book Essay Help banned book essay help Write a paper about why the hunger games book should be banned. Are you looking for a similar paper or any other quality academic essay? Banned Book Essay Help. banned book essay help Free Essays on Banned Books. Get help with your writing. 1 through 30Feb 01, im writing an essay and need some help on why books shouldnt be banned. i already have some ideas but i need a few more basic reasons why these are a Happy Banned Books Week! there’s lots of ways you can help celebrate Our.